Domestic Violence Essay

The Negative Results of Childhood Exposure to Domestic frenzy The phrase interior(prenominal) force out typically refers to furiousness between pornographic intimate partners. It has been estimated that every year thither are about 3.3 to 10 million nestlingren exposed to domesticated violence in the confines of their own home (Moylan, Herrenkohl, Sousa et al. 2009). According to research conducted by John W. Fantuzzo and Wanda K. Mohr(1999) exposure to domestic violence bed include watching or hearing the violent events, order involvement (for example, trying to intervene or calling the police), or experiencing the backwash (for example, seeing bruises or observing maternal depression) (Fantuzzo &arbitrator Mohr, 22). The set up of exposure undersurface vary from have effects such as behavioural and developmental issues to interpersonal relationships, all of which lead to detrimental prospects on the childs development. This paper will explore those effects and how it affects children.Exposure to violence in the first years of life brings about helplessness and bratwurst which can be attributed to the lack of protection received by the parent. The child can no longer trust their parent as a protector (Lieberman 2007). This lack of trust early in life can bring about serious problems later in life, as there is no resolution to the first psycho affable crisis, trust vs. mistrust. For these children exposed to domestic violence, the ideational monsters that children perceive are not only symbolic representations or a dream. The monsters that children who witness domestic violence hold in to deal with carry the observation of their parents. Children who witness domestic violence face a dilemma because the childrens parents are at their most frightening exactly when the child inevitably them the most. The security of the child is shattered as their protector becomes the attacker in reality and the child has nowhere to turn for help (Lieberman 20 07).Exposure to family and residential district violence is linked with aggressive behavior. One of the theoretical perspectives that explains this link is fond study theory, according to which children learn from the aggressive models in their environments. Additionally, victimization whitethorn compromise childrens ability to regulate their emotions, and as a exit they may act out aggressively (Margolin &ump Gordis 2004, 153). Posttraumatic accent symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are important consequences of exposure to violence because they can flub social and behavioural functioning (Margolin &ump Gordis 2004, 153). Research has shown that children exposed to domestic violence demonstrate impaired ability to concentrate, difficulty with schoolwork, and significantly displace scores when their verbal, motor, and cognitive skills were being tested (Fantuzzo &ump Mohr). It seems as if the donnish and cognitive difficulties from exposure affect the child p ossibly through its squeeze on psychological functioning.For example, PTSD and depression may hinder with learning and the ability to perform well in the classroom (Margolin &ump Gordis 2004). Researchers have erect a positive correlation between externalizing (aggression) and internalizing (lowered self esteem, depression, anxiety) and domestic violence exposed children. Children exposed to domestic violence have been found to be four times more likely to develop internalizing or externalizing behavior problems than children who are not exposed to violence. The disruption of the development of raw material competencies harms the childs ability to manage emotions effectively and increases internalizing and externalizing behaviors (Martinez-Torteya et. al., 2009). This is particularly knotty for preschool aged children as younger children display more intense externalizing and internalizing behavioral responses to parental conflict than older children do (Ybarra, Wilkens, &ump Li eberman 2007).These responses are delinquent in part to less mature cognitive skills. Because these skills have not advanced yet, there is an increase in the likelihood of the child expressing psychological vulnerabilities following the conflict because of cognitive errors. Exposure to domestic violence compromises interpersonal relationships that are the foundation of childrens daily lives in addition to having direct effects. Social support is a key buffer against the negative effects of violence. Because parents are key sources of social support, the disrupted parenting associated with family violence may aggravate negative effects of exposure to violence. More generally, children exposed to violence may be sensitized to hostile interactions and may have difficulty negotiating helpmate conflicts. These interpersonal difficulties can rob children of social support and increase their riskiness for associating with deviant peers (Margolin &ump Gordis 2004, 154). In a study condu cted by C. McGee, it was account that many children found it difficult to develop friendships for reasons such as prop back from others as well as fear of inviting others to their home (Adams 2006).In conclusion, it is all the way shown that domestic violence has a negative effect on the children who witness it. An expanding body of research suggests that childhood trauma and adverse experiences can lead to a variety of negative health outcomes (Anda &ump Chapman &ump Dube &ump Felitti &ump Giles &ump Williamson, 2001, p.1). In fact, childhood stressors such as witnessing domestic violence and other household dysfunctions are highly relate and have a graded relationship to numerous health and social problems (Anda &ump Chapman &ump Dube &ump Felitti &ump Giles &ump Williamson, 2001, p.2). It is obvious and clearly shown that the children who witness domestic abuse have serious long destination mental effects.